# A Discussion on DAOs Performance, Funding, and a way forward **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Created:** [July 7, 2022, 11:20pm UTC](https://talk.harmony.one/t/a-discussion-on-daos-performance-funding-and-a-way-forward/20378 "2022-07-07T23:20:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 36
**Author:** ![Suede0619](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/talk.harmony.one/suede0619/32/7494_2.png) [@Suede0619](https://talk.harmony.one/u/Suede0619)\ **Post date:** [August 8, 2022, 6:19pm UTC](https://talk.harmony.one/t/a-discussion-on-daos-performance-funding-and-a-way-forward/20378/36 "2022-08-08T18:19:43Z")
@Pioneer ~ with regard to the LighItUpDAO - you don’t have that quite right. All the reporting for the DAO is here: > [@DAO Reporting Discussion](https://talk.harmony.one/t/dao-reporting-discussion/16198/8): > > If it is of any value, I’d like to hand over some of my own recommendations for the DAO’s. This is a list of where I see most issues stemming from. Thank you blush •Daos need onboarding requirements. •They need funding transparency reporting. heavy_check_mark •They need to sign on time. •They need to deliver bi-monthly or else the funding should be halted until a notice is given. •They need to have at least 9 signers. heavy_check_mark •They need a proposal written after new elections… Also I don’t agree with your opinion that our deliverables are ‘largely superficial.’ We accomplished and exceeded the deliverables that we promised when funded. In my opinion crypto education, visibility for digital artists, and learning real skills are not superficial. Bravo - on this in depth analysis, I also like to call it out when I see it. So I respect your courage. > --- _[View the full topic](https://talk.harmony.one/t/a-discussion-on-daos-performance-funding-and-a-way-forward/20378)._