Good summary for me
Auditors must be patient and voters are encouraged to do so, even young and old auditors alike
@AffinityShard @PeaceLoveHarmony @Jimbo_JCR.one any issues with being nominated? If not Iâll set up the chat with you on TG.
Thanks Tim, Iâm happy to
It shouldâve said validator corps not core typo on my part.
Iâll be fixing my truck today, so intermittent availability, but yes letâs do this.
Iâd be happy to assist. Thank you everyone for putting your faith in me to represent you, it means a lot.
Do we have a list of which validators will be funded and for how much? Do we know when delegations will start?
@dpagan-harmony @StrongMindsHold @Jimbo_JCR.one @PeaceLoveHarmony @AffinityShard
The sheet has been handed over. Hopefully soon. It is all focused on smaller Validators with some new.
FYI - the delegations will be reviewed quarterly, and stake amounts for individual validators and for the overall campaign are subject to change upon review.
Tim
Hi Tim. Just wondering what happened with the discussion on whatâs going on with staking rewards. I havenât noticed any voting.
Hi Tim,
The Community DAO is going to stake part of its Treasury to smaller Validators. I saw a possible idea of granting some of this to the Community which we could stake for some passive income for the DAO.
Is this an option? @Tr4ck3r mentioned this post and definitely seemed like a good idea to at least ask!
Thanks for everything you do!
Rob - the discussion never really took off unfortunately. As far as I know the rewards are just sitting there.
Community discussion needs to happen ASAP. I noticed on the last H.E.R. That the team is already thinking about using the rewards for whatever they want, yet again would be going back on their word. If the team wants to build anything meaningful, @HarmonyTeam need to focus on not burning anymore bridges by saying one thing and doing another. Taking advantage of situations. Itâs one thing when itâs out of your control because of a $100 million hack, but for no reason is wrong and unprofessional.
Iâm imploring you to stay focused. You canât keep making fools of your shareholders.
There is plenty of great ideas on how to use the rewards, but just like the initiative the team has failed to follow through.
Also I never got a reply on the âFellowshipâ validator that has 5.5 million ONE delegated to them from this initiative with 100% commission. Also key diving. You must know something about it because they werenât on the list of eligible validators. Yet thereâs still ONE delegated to validators that have shutdown.
I second this motion.
Use a part of the 200M for grants please. Would be a great time for it.
Most of the projects that were awarded grants turned out to be scams. Now it is difficult to find even the organizers of these projects
Should the rewards from the staking initiative go towards past debt owed to core DAOâs like the Validator DAO, Community DAO, and Developer DAO. Recovery efforts, or a bootstrap initiative led by the VDAO. What do you feel is most important to take care of?
- Past debt that is owed to core DAOâs (including term1 VDAO)
- Recovery efforts
- Bootstrap initiative led by VDAO
If you have any other ideas, or suggestions, please feel free to reply.
Thank you
I agree with both.
Yes. We need to reactivate Defi asap. There is nothing there.
Need be a decent GRANT program this time.
We have 2 problems to solve this time:
- recover the trust about this kind of program
- Deeply doxed proponents