Validator DAO Term 1 Compensation

I agree with Jim. The ONE paid should be based on the price at the time business was conducted, and as @easynode mentioned, an additional fee to compensate us on lost staking revenue. It’s not very Harmonious to pay out past due invoices only when the underlying asset encroaches new highs.

I hope this becomes a valuable learning lesson for the Harmony team, as acting unethical (be it intentional or not) comes with just consequences.

4 Likes

Voting snapshot is up.
https://gov.harmony.one/#/dao-mainnet/proposal/QmXxJLDbJZ3RcuW5g2PuuhgEot3eihkNjiyYUJmU9YUaqs

2 Likes

Voting is live if you can get a vote txns to go through.

2 Likes

up to 34 votes already :smirk: @frwrdslosh

4 Likes

So if it is past 20, is there any reason to continue the vote until the 31st?

4 Likes

46-0, the validators have spoken, hah!

4 Likes

It is acknowledged that the Quorum for VDAO1 funding has been well exceeded! There weren’t any doubts.

VDAO1 funding will be sent to the VDAO multisig when the next batch of funding is sent out.

@Sam @lij

4 Likes

this might help to specify the numbers to be sent

2 Likes

@Sam @Jimbo_JCR.one moving this from the grant proposal category to the governance category

1 Like

Is there a specific reason for the move?

1 Like

IMG_20220130_135359_967
This vote is closed and has met full governance quorum from the validator corp.
@lij @Sam @frwrdslosh @Jacksteroo @dpagan-harmony

5 Likes

6 weeks later… LOTS of funding been sent out to many projects?

Did you forget about us?

It has now been 9 months since we were elected…

4 Likes

I wanted to update you all on the funding of the VDAO Term 1 Compensation.

Thanks again for your patience!!

Sam

1 Like