In the interest of making prudent decision-making related to on-chain decision making & governance, I would specifically like to invite @lij & @stse for their 1st community meeting with key stakeholders such as members of developer DAO, Validator DAO & community partners for a video conference call, moderated by governors & core team members collectively - BEFORE the chain hard-fork proposal is put to action.
It is imperative that BOTH members be present on the call session that should approximately last 2 hours.
A failure to respond & non-agreement to setting up & participating in a community interaction would be construed as “intentional negligence & malice” towards the community & different stakeholders for effective resolution of the subject matter. The call will be a recorded session.
Agenda of this call should entail community circumstances leading upto the hack, details about the bridge incident, setting up an appropriate voting process to pass a governance proposal FIRST, measures taken to re-peg the bridge & clearing air around other non-disclosures.
That’s not the best way to organize a call. How about a little notice? We waited long enough for the shit proposal that was released. My patience is wearing thin.
I’ve tried to organize plenty of AMA’s with Validators in the past. Announcing in a post on talk forum with little notice and a couple telegram groups doesn’t work. If Harmony core team actually communicated with the VDAO, they’d know this. Instead they just want to sweep us under the rug. Along with other core DAO’s.
They could’ve just been upfront and said “stop wasting your time, we’re never going to talk to you.” Instead it was we’ll talk to you in a couple weeks, then nothing but crickets again.
Yes, I agree it needs to be asap but it needs to actually give us a chance to attend. It should’ve at LEAST been recorded so Validators can listen and give feedback.
Instead I only saw a list of some ideas with no names attached to them.
@Jacksteroo why calling for a meeting and don’t allow people to enter and speak? I waited two time 10 minutes and was not allowed to enter your “public” meeting. Next time make a real public meeting not where you select who can show up and speak.
It’s just a misunderstanding. I am just a community member and I was in the meeting yesterday. Jack was answering every question and was writing notes. I am sure he didn’t pay attention that more people wanted to come. Probably it would have been better if he made the video call “public”. Please don’t take it personally or something like that. Jack is amazing
Second that @Maddog77 - Let’s put it this way. He is really patient, smart & kind in his approach, and does know how to get the message across. Exactly the individual this project needs.
He only had one hour yesterday, but opening up the charter to all would have helped. Just to reiterate, this was the originally scheduled call session set up for validators & not a separate meeting. Yes, multiple community presented proposals were discussed as well, in addition to voting mechanism, and notes were taken.
Jack has also provided his email address to @Pioneer & other validators on the call to email him if there are any questions or suggestions.
I’m 100% sure that another event would be scheduled where amended version of proposals will be presented, the floor would be open to the community - A recorded session.
Twitter Spaces have usually operated as a quite loose discussion platform, therefore, it’s difficult to stick to an agenda as team members have limited time.
