Yes 0.001 ONE per hour for 100 ONE with 8.76% APY
Can we include the at least 1one to claim info? I think it’s is also essential!
Didn’t knew this. 
I can write up a separate proposal for that later. Sounds like it would have to be voted on separately from this.
Yes! Please. This is great, this crossed my mind and probably of a lot of people using the staking dashboard. This is a great idea.
Also agree with this one. Whatever improves the quality of the staking portal, is well received!
Agreed! this is such a brilliant idea for many new joiners to staking.
yes and we can tie them together if anything once it’s discussed.
I think adding the decimal is a no-brainer and I’m 100% agreeing with this proposal.
yes. this is a good idea 
Both my hands are up! Absolutely, Yes!
Yes, please add decimals. Thank you so much.
Great idea and I absolutely support it.
Please Vote here 
https://gov.harmony.one/#/dao-mainnet/proposal/QmTzqwz6acqpEExRgSZ49dVa5516sFEJ4iSHJeJ8Xnf3yT
Please Vote here
…
https://gov.harmony.one/#/dao-mainnet/proposal/QmTzqwz6acqpEExRgSZ49dVa5516sFEJ4iSHJeJ8Xnf3yT
This will change the perception of the staking program for those delegating with 100 ONEs and maybe soon 10 ONEs.
This will improve the user experience of small validators. I think this one should be implemented as there are more “fish” then whale delegators, and this might help bringing in even more small delegators to harmony
Please Don’t forget to Vote here
…
https://gov.harmony.one/#/dao-mainnet/proposal/QmTzqwz6acqpEExRgSZ49dVa5516sFEJ4iSHJeJ8Xnf3yT
Please Don’t forget to Vote here
…
https://gov.harmony.one/#/dao-mainnet/proposal/QmTzqwz6acqpEExRgSZ49dVa5516sFEJ4iSHJeJ8Xnf3yT
I understand this has already been voted on, but should the decimals not also be added to “Total ONE”, “Available” and “Staked” as well (see: image in OP)? Not just “Rewards”.
Summary : This Proposal is to add decimals to the Harmony Staking Dashboard.
Since the HIP was to “add decimals to the dashboard”, and not “only” to the rewards value, I don’t think it’s necessarily wrong to include this after the fact?
Using the image in the OP as an example, if you claim 0.22 ONE in rewards to your staked amount of 12220000, it’s possible the 12220000 won’t increase to 12220001. It would create the same type of dilemma for the delegator that this HIP is attempting to solve